top of page

Israel can say thanks but no thanks to US if willing to pay the Price

 

Surprises are Trump's way of conducting policy, both domestic and foreign, but Israel must prepare diplomatic contingency plans for any sudden shift in American policy after US president's decision on Iran, Houthis, Saudis and Hamas 

 



By Michael Oren

Along with “no daylight,” one of the longstanding principles of the U.S.-Israel alliance was “no surprises.” This meant that if the American president planned on making a major policy statement on the Middle East, especially one that impacted our security, Israeli leaders would be given the opportunity to review it first and submit their comments.


So it was with President Bush’s “Road Map” of 2002, a copy of which was sent to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon two weeks in advance. President Obama was the first to discard the “no surprises” principle. He gave his earthshaking Cairo speech of 2009, and many subsequent policy statements on Israel, without giving us the slightest advance notice.

 

It seems now that the principle has again been discarded. Recent months have seen Israel surprised again and again by the White House. According to press reports, Prime Minister Netanyahu was surprised by President Trump’s announcement of renewed talks between the United States and Iran, about the ceasefire deal with the Houthis, and the decoupling of America’s supply of civilian nuclear power to Saudi Arabia from the issue of Saudi-Israeli peace. Most recently, Netanyahu was reportedly surprised by the deal the administration made with Hamas for the release of the American-Israeli hostage, Edan Alexander.

 

Contrary to the conventional wisdom of the press, I do not believe that Trump is doing this to downgrade Israel. Surprises are his way of conducting policy, both domestic and foreign. Just ask the leaders of the NATO countries, the G7, and China. Just ask Zelensky. We should be surprised if we’re not surprised.

 

But enough. Israel must prepare diplomatic contingency plans for any sudden shift in American policy. We must ask ourselves what our position will be if the United States recognizes Palestine, renews Trump’s two-state “deal of the century,” or demands an immediate ceasefire in Gaza? In which instance will Israel be willing to say “thank you but no” to the president and, if we do, what is the price we will be willing to pay?

 

Throughout, we must never give up trying to ascertain what the White House is thinking and which directions it’s liable to take. But we must never be caught completely off-guard or unprepared to respond boldly to changes. The principle of no surprises may be forgotten, but not our ability—and our right—to act as we must to ensure our security. We, too, can surprise.

Israel can say thanks but no thanks to US if willing to pay the Price
¿Cómo mueren las democracias?
Schindler's "Liszt": Roman Polanski's mistake about the Holocaust
We Can Only Rely on Ourselves
Mi abuelita Fanny
Mi otro hijo
Vargas Llosa e Israel
Los Jayalim del Asado
A Memorial Day Plea
La política del espectáculo
The Martha Road School of International Affairs
There’s only one way US-Iran talks should end: Halt Tehran’s nuclear terror for good
comente

Comentarios

Últimas publicaciones

Caravane_Marco_Polo.jpg

Radanita (en hebreo, Radhani, רדהני) es el nombre dado a los viajeros y mercaderes judíos que dominaron el comercio entre cristianos y musulmanes entre los siglos VII al XI. La red comercial cubría la mayor parte de Europa, África del Norte, Cercano Oriente, Asia Central, parte de la India y de China. Trascendiendo en el tiempo y el espacio, los radanitas sirvieron de puente cultural entre mundos en conflicto donde pudieron moverse con facilidad, pero fueron criticados por muchos.

Todos los derechos reservados @valijadeapocrifos.com

bottom of page